WOW, I though I would never see this. Donald Trump was just impeached AGAIN! This time the impeachable offense is a statutory crime. We should have just invited him to the Senate last March 15 and been done with it.

The Founding Fathers wrote impeachment—originally a Roman political institution—into the constitution for the purpose of removing an official who had “rendered himself obnoxious,” in the words of Benjamin Franklin. Without impeachment, Franklin argued, citizens’ only recourse was assassination, which would leave the political official “not only deprived of his life but of the opportunity of vindicating his character.”  It would be best, Franklin argued, “to provide the Constitution for the regular punishment of the Executive when his misconduct should deserve it, and for his honorable acquittal when he should be justly accused.”

Impeachment as an institution has its roots in ancient Rome.  Only senators could be impeached in ancient Rome—the emperor could not, leading to several chaos-making political assassinations (“et tu Brute”).   Franklin, and others like Alexander Hamilton, paid special attention to impeachment because British politics didn’t have a structure for impeaching the leader. The British crown—the king or queen—is literally unimpeachable.

The Founding Fathers didn’t think that impeachment should happen for just any reason. For example, Hamilton wrote in the Federalist papers that grounds for impeachment should be

“Those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”

The founders also debated on the criteria for impeachment, settling on treason, bribery and high crimes and misdemeanors against the state. “High crimes and misdemeanors” was another term that originated in British law.  A High Crime is activity by or against those who have special duties acquired by taking an oath of office that are not shared with common persons. A high crime is one that can be done only by someone in a unique position of authority, which is political in character, who does things to circumvent justice.  Impeachment on these grounds was considered better for the country than assassination. “The Constitution’s impeachment procedures make the removal of the chief magistrate less violent, less disruptive, and less error-prone than assassination.” 

So, Donald Trump finally got a legacy. He is now the undisputed WORST PRESIDENT in the history of the United States. Very few presidents have angered Congress enough to warrant impeachment but NO other president has every been impeached TWICE!

Published by Michael Carver

My goal is to bring history alive through interactive portrayal of ordinary American life in the late 18th Century (1750—1799) My persona are: Journeyman Brewer; Cordwainer (leather tradesman but not cobbler), Statesman and Orator; Chandler (candle and soap maker); Gentleman Scientist; and, Soldier in either the British Regular Army, the Centennial Army, or one of the various Militia. Let me help you experience history 1st hand!

3 replies on “We Should have Just Taken the Traditional Approach to Rebuking the Head of State”

  1. Yes, it is hard to see how rejection of state certified election results, calling together a mob, and inciting that mob to march on the capitol to disrupt legislators in their constitutional duties isn’t grounds for impeachment. If it isn’t what is? Even if the results were unintended, the absence of any real attempt to put down the insurrection, shows a shocking disregard for his duty to keep the peace.


    1. Absolutely. Of course if the results were unintended, that belies a lack of basic intelligence needed to serve in ANY high office. Not only is it an absolute must that the House impeach Trump but a test to the Senate for who are they most loyal to, the country or the party. God I miss real principled Republicans who stand for something other than self. I was proud to see Mitt Romney and Elizabeth Chaney stand up for the Constitution. Now if only Liz would invite Donald to Wyoming for a little duck hunting with Dick. Maybe this time he could use buckshot.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: